Executive President

Singapore time 9.37 am 13th February 2008

You can see most countries with executive presidents/kings are not so stable. America is a living example. American society is rotten to the core. They spend so much money just to choose a new president every year. The amount spent can save billions of poor people.

President of Timor Leste was shot and now in hospital. A new country but violence prone. Is it better now then when it was under Indonesian rule ? Sp democracy is breeding more violence ?

Just look at Afghanistan. Is it any better ? With 45,000 foreign troops, the country is still suffering. Can foreign soldiers solve their problems ?

Their neighbour is in a mess also. Pakistan was once having not active president. But the military did not favour the rulers, so many are toppled. Prime minister was sacked. Prime minister was charged for corruption. All these were initiated by the military generals to hold on power. So where is democracy. Constitution was amended to have executive president under the former general holding power.

This is not good. The fighting in Afghanistan will come over to Pakistan if they do not amend their constitution for an appointed president without political power, just like in India. Although this is still inperfect, the country is still stable in a way.

So for peace to come to Afghanistan, Pakistan, Timor Leste, Palestine etc, country constitution has to be amended to have an appointed president without any political power.

Likewise, for a prosperous America, it has to amend its constitution to have an appointed president without power.

My words are like swords. They can slaughter. Or they are my iron rod that is to whack disobedient people into submission. Nature will be responsible for doing destruction on behalf of my action.